In the past, anxiety builds up whenever I think of the opportunity cost of teaching as the lack of time to do research. This past trimester of school has taught me to put away the dichotomy in the categories of "teaching" and "research". I would have been worse off in terms of my academic reach if I had not taught the book of Daniel this term. No doubt, teaching is so time-consuming that one finds little time to revise a PhD thesis with the aim of publication or to write anything proper, such as an article length paper. To accomplish either is to sacrifice sleep and possibly health.
But I had a pleasant surprise at what I had accomplished this trimester with the book of Daniel. My understanding of the message of the book, the meaning of its prophecies and the context for its composition had grown tremedously, starting from scratch! Though I have studied the book of Revelation, I had not paid much attention to Daniel, apologetically because it rests in a totally different era and situation of composition. I see the common beastly images and the three and half years applied in Revelation, not neccesarily to mean the same thing as in Daniel.
But having done research on Revelation facilitates my understanding of Daniel. Both share the characteristics of the apocalyptic genre, albeit separated by time and space. There is a certain familarity with the tools to interprete Daniel and its compositional context.
As it is my first serious encounter with the book of Daniel, I just like to note some preliminary observations for further thought:
1. The context of Antiochus Epiphanes becomes increasingly prominent from chapter seven of the book. There is undeniable correlation between these parts and the the first and second books of the Maccabees, to the extent that even the temporal intrigues of the half seven years, 1290 and 1335 can perhaps take the cue from the timeline of the events narrated in First and Second Maccabees, despite discrepancies between the two books. There is clear equivalence between the "abomination that causes desolation" in Daniel and in the Maccabees, and the contexts of the persecution of observing Jews by the little horn in Daniel.
2. A difficulty in Daniel lies in pinpointing the exact context for its composition. What situation has prompted the redactor-author to put together the prophecies Daniel received? I opt for a late date for the composition of the whole work: the prominence of the second century BCE context, which sums up the book--is too striking to be disregarded. (But this does not mean that I see the visions Daniel received as ex-eventu. They were received as dated in the book of Daniel, but were simply collated by a much later redactor for his purposes.) So could the perseuction of the Jews in Judaea by Antiochus Epiphanes have been the reason for the admonishment to remain steadfast until the end of 1335 days? How is one to understand the countdown in 12:12?
3. The other difficulty is the interpretation of the various time frames spelt out in the seventy sevens of 9.24-27. Other visions/dreams have been quite well interpreted by commentators.
Seneca on Treatment of Slaves (Letter 47) – a must-read
19 minutes ago